Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Infect Public Health ; 16(7): 1023-1032, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37178476

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of central venous catheters (CVC) is associated with higher morbidity and mortality, related to infectious complications, contributing to poorer clinical outcomes and increased healthcare costs. According to the literature, the incidence of local infections related to CVC for hemodialysis is highly variable. This variability is related to differences in definitions of catheter-related infections. OBJECTIVE: To identify signs and symptoms for determining local infections (exit site and tunnel tract infections) used in the literature in tunnelled and nontunnelled CVC for hemodialysis. DESIGN: Systematic review METHODS: Structured electronic searches were conducted in five electronic databases, from 1 January 2000-31 August 2022, using key words and specific vocabulary, as well as manual searches in several journals. Additionally, vascular access clinical guidelines and infection control clinical guidelines were reviewed. RESULTS: After validity analysis, we selected 40 studies and seven clinical guidelines. The definitions of exit site infection and tunnel infection used in the different studies were heterogeneous. Among the studies, seven (17,5 %) used the definitions of exit site and tunnel infection based on a clinical practice guideline. Three of the studies (7.5 %) used the Twardowski scale definition of exit site infection or a modification. The remaining 30 studies (75 %) used different combinations of signs and symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Definitions of local CVC infections are highly heterogeneous in the revised literature. It is necessary to establish a consensus regarding the definitions of hemodialysis CVC exit site and tunnel infections. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022351097).


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Humanos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Incidência , Cateteres de Demora
2.
Dermatol Online J ; 23(2)2017 Feb 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28329500

RESUMO

El acantoma de la vaina pilosa es un tumor benignode piel muy poco frecuente. Suele presentarse comouna pápula asintomática, con un orificio central y lalocalización más frecuente es la cara. Presentamos unnuevo caso de acantoma de vaina pilosa, apoartandoimagen dermatoscópica del tumor.


Assuntos
Acantoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Faciais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Acantoma/patologia , Adulto , Neoplasias Faciais/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia
3.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 107(9): 554-8, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26334462

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: The understanding of lactose intolerance (LI) is limited in some professional settings. Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD) and Sociedad Española de Medicina General (SEMG) have developed a survey in order to: a) Analyze primary care physicians (PCPs) knowledge and clinical management; and b) to compare results with those of a previous survey of Spanish gastroenterologists (GEs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online questionnaire was sent to SEMG members with 27 items on various issues: Demographics, occupational characteristics, outlook on LI, diagnostic tests, treatment, and follow-up. Results were compared to those from a survey of GEs. RESULTS: A total of 456 PCPs responded, versus 477 GEs. PCPs had an older mean age and longer professional experience. Level of understanding of LI was similar, albeit a higher proportion of PCPs lacked epidemiological awareness (p < 0.01). GEs tended to consider LI a "minor" condition (71.3 vs. 40.1%; p > 0.001), and LI symptoms as overlapping those of irritable bowel syndrome (93.5 vs. 88.2%; p = 0.005), although symptoms perceived as suspicious of LI were similar in both groups. Dietary recommendations were recognized as the primary therapeutic approach. CONCLUSION: This study reveals the outlook of PCPs on LI, and allows comparison with that of GEs, as a basis for the development of strategies aimed at improving LI understanding, approach and management in our setting.


Assuntos
Gastroenterologistas , Intolerância à Lactose/terapia , Médicos de Atenção Primária , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Intolerância à Lactose/dietoterapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Médicos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA